Complaint Escalation Monitoring Playbook
Detects high-severity complaints, legal risk language, and escalation triggers in conversations. Supports proactive intervention and compliance oversight.
Start building
Deploy this kit stack into your workspace. Customize bricks, scoring, and outputs to match your team.
Without this playbook
Most teams handle complaint escalation monitoring through scattered call reviews, manager opinion, and isolated examples. Without a shared operational definition, the signals stay inconsistent and difficult to act on across volume.
With this playbook
A shared, repeatable lens for complaint escalation monitoring - with structured outputs you can route into coaching, reporting, and workflow automation. Every conversation produces evidence, not just opinions.
Built for
QA managers, compliance officers, and operations leads
When teams use it
- Automated QA scoring at full coverage
- Compliance audit preparation
- Exception and escalation routing
The operational stack
3 kits behind this playbook
Not all complaints are equal, and the ones that matter most are the ones that get buried. This stack separates complaint severity to prioritise the most urgent cases, legal and risk language detection to catch potential exposure before it escalates, and resolution tracking to determine whether the conversation actually resolved the issue or trapped it in a loop. Compliance teams get structured triage instead of relying on agents to self-report the conversations that went badly.
Escalation Severity Kit
3 bricks
Detects complaint severity and escalation triggers.
Included bricks
Review this kitSeverity Language Present
BooleanDetects whether language conveying the severity or urgency of an issue is explicitly present - words signalling significant negative impact, escalation, or critical consequence.
Risk Context Type
CategoryClassifies the primary type of risk discussed in the conversation - legal, operational, financial, commercial, or other.
Severity Score Score
ScoreScores overall compliance severity as a composite, determined by the most severe individual issue present.
Legal/Risk Mention Kit
3 bricks
Flags legal or risk phrases in conversations.
Included bricks
Review this kitRisk Or Legal Phrase Present
BooleanDetects whether any language referencing legal exposure, legal process, or risk is explicitly present in the conversation.
Risk Language State
CategoryClassifies the presence and coverage of risk or legal language in the conversation. Note: category_values reflect presence/coverage, not risk type - see risk_context_type_v1_explained for type classification.
Severity Rating Score
ScoreScores the severity of risk-related statements made in the conversation.
Resolution Alert Kit
3 bricks
Detects whether escalation or complaint is resolved or trapped.
Included bricks
Review this kitIssue Unresolved Present
BooleanDetects whether an issue remained unresolved at the end of the conversation without an accepted follow-up commitment.
Resolution Signal Present
BooleanDetects whether both parties explicitly confirm that the issue has been resolved.
Resolution Quality Score
ScoreScores the overall quality of the resolution provided, across clarity, specificity, confirmation, and follow-up commitment.
Knowledge base
Supporting materials
The kits in this playbook work best when backed by reference materials that ground the evaluation. Upload these into your workspace knowledge base to improve accuracy and relevance.
Learn more about Knowledge BasesComplaint severity classification criteria
Legal risk language lists and regulatory red flags
Escalation procedures and resolution authority documentation
Regulatory reporting requirements for complaints
Complaint resolution SLA documentation and tracking requirements
Structured output
What you get back
Every conversation processed through this stack produces a structured JSON object. Each brick contributes a typed field - booleans, scores, categories, or string lists - that you can route, aggregate, and report on.
Example output shape
{
"severity_language_present": true,
"risk_context_type": "Strong",
"severity_score_score": 7,
"risk_or_legal_phrase_present": true,
"risk_language_state": "Strong",
"severity_rating_score": 7,
"issue_unresolved_present": true,
"resolution_signal_present": true,
"resolution_quality_score": 7
}In practice
How teams use these outputs
The structured outputs from this stack integrate into your existing workflows. Use them wherever you need repeatable, evidence-based signal from conversations.
Automated QA scoring at full coverage
Compliance audit preparation
Exception and escalation routing
Agent performance reporting
Get started
Deploy this playbook in your workspace
Customizing creates a workspace-owned draft with this playbook's full kit stack. Adjust bricks, scoring, and outputs to fit your team, then publish when ready.