Structured intelligence from
every people conversation
From candidate interviews to exit conversations, people teams generate critical conversational data every day. Semarize extracts structured evaluation signals - making hiring more consistent, retention more proactive, and feedback more actionable.
Industry challenges
People decisions rely on
unstructured impressions
HR and talent teams make high-stakes decisions based on conversations - but rarely have structured, consistent data from those interactions.
Interview scoring is inconsistent
Different interviewers evaluate candidates differently. Without a structured rubric applied consistently, hiring decisions are vulnerable to bias and subjectivity.
Exit insights are lost
Exit interviews surface reasons for attrition, but insights stay in notes or summaries. Patterns across departures are difficult to identify and trend.
Manager 1:1 quality varies
Some managers have excellent development conversations; others don't. Without structured signals from 1:1s, coaching quality is invisible to HR leaders.
Candidate experience is unmeasured
The quality of how your team conducts interviews affects employer brand. Without evaluation, poor candidate experience goes undetected.
Use cases
Key use cases for
HR & talent teams
Semarize applies the same structured evaluation to people conversations that it brings to sales and customer interactions.
QA & Compliance
Ensure interview processes follow legal requirements, DEI guidelines, and internal standards across every candidate interaction.
Customer Success
Track onboarding quality, employee sentiment, and retention risk from HR conversations. Detect disengagement signals before they become attrition.
Sales Coaching
Apply the same coaching signal methodology to manager 1:1s and development conversations. Measure feedback quality at scale.
Data Science
Feed structured interview and exit data into your people analytics platform. Correlate conversation signals with retention and performance.
How Semarize fits
Semarize connects to
your HR tech stack
API-first integration with ATS, HRIS, and people analytics platforms. Structured signals flow into the systems your HR team already uses.
ATS integration
Push structured interview scores to Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, or any ATS. Consistent evaluation data attached to every candidate record.
People analytics feeds
Feed structured conversation signals into Visier, Culture Amp, or your analytics platform. Correlate with engagement, performance, and attrition data.
Compliance documentation
Evidence-backed evaluation records for every interview. Audit trails showing exactly what was assessed and how.
Meeting platform agnostic
Process interview recordings from Zoom, Teams, or any video platform. Evaluate the conversation, not the tool.
Bricks & Kits
Example Bricks for
hr & talent
Industry-specific Bricks evaluate the dimensions that matter for hr & talent management teams. Bundle them into Kits to create reusable evaluation frameworks.
Interviewer asked pre-defined structured questions
Candidate competency rating for specific skill area
Potentially biased or non-compliant questions detected
Candidate engagement and enthusiasm level
Departure reasons mentioned
Quality of feedback provided in 1:1
Interview Evaluation Kit
kitConsistent, structured evaluation for every candidate interview.
Output
Structured signals, not summaries
Every evaluation returns deterministic JSON with typed values, reasons, and evidence spans. Same schema every time.
{
"run_id": "run_ghi789",
"status": "succeeded",
"output": {
"bricks": {
"competency_score": {
"value": 72,
"confidence": 0.86,
"reason": "Strong technical depth, but limited systems design discussion",
"evidence": ["...deep knowledge of distributed caching...", "...didn't address scalability..."]
},
"bias_indicator": {
"value": false,
"confidence": 0.93,
"reason": "No potentially biased questions detected",
"evidence": []
},
"candidate_engagement": {
"value": 85,
"confidence": 0.89,
"reason": "Candidate asked multiple follow-up questions and expressed enthusiasm",
"evidence": ["...I'm really excited about the team's approach...", "...can I ask about the roadmap?..."]
}
}
}
}Make people decisions
with structured data.
Consistent interview scoring. Proactive retention signals. Evidence-backed evaluation for every people conversation.